Sunday, January 31, 2010
Expected To Do The Impossible
We are expected to do the impossible. Is it possible to do the impossible? Let me explain what I mean — there is zero evidence to support the existence of a god. This means, hypothetically, if a god existed, he has made no attempt to make his existence known (or any solid attempt which is known to us). On the other hand (according to many 'believers') he expects us to be aware of his existence. At this point, it is probably obvious where I'm going with this — but just think about it. Because this point really shoots a hole in the already torn-up argument given by the religious. We gain information via the senses, and obviously no god has made any attempt to reach us humans (we can only be reached when we have sensory input). Perhaps I should clarify what I mean, no god has made an attempt to reach us humans which is beyond the capacity of hallucination (something which we know exists). If a god really wanted people to know about him (or her), he would reach all people (he/she is all-powerful remember). Believers will claim that a god has reached us with prophets. But these prophets always seem to come across as being mentally disturbed. As I have said many times: "Christians have faith that no-one during biblical-times had schizophrenia". Of course ignorant man would not understand hallucination, and would view it has "holy" or whatever. Do the religious really expect people to believe the preaches given by those which appear insane? If the religious think this is enough evidence, then they expect the logical to do the impossible.
Labels:
blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good point but the christians wont understand it
ReplyDelete