Fishing for Liberal Debate (in the Yahoo comment section)

I wrote the following to stir the pot. The news story was about gay marriage on some military base. Anyways, while I don't hate gay people (or have much of an opinion about them), I don't like the definition (perception) of marriage changing in my society. Now that liberals have gotten their foot in the door, over time, people will lose touch with the real purpose behind marriage—the union of man and woman for the purpose of creating offspring in a nurturing environment. With all liberals have fought for over the last 50-60 years, we have seen the family get decimated (approximately 50% divorce rate). Don't get me wrong, I don't hate liberals (or anyone), but I believe they are seriously misguided on many issues. Anyways, enough of my rambling, here is the post:

ME: "Liberal Strategy for getting their way: Push it in society's face until the people get used to it; it's brainwashing. Realize, morality is a perception; it's merely based on opinion (thus cannot be factual). Liberalism is a secular religion with its own god ([changing tradition]al social structures, customs, values, etc.), and they have faith that what they are fighting for is "progressive".If liberals got there way on every issue, they would still want something else to change. Essentially they look for what societal behavior is traditionally taboo and then fight for it, normalize, then move on. This is why liberals gravitate towards things like lewdness, vulgarity, self-destruction, and laziness (work ethic is traditionally valued). In other words, they fight for those who are considered social misfits. Liberals disobey authority like a brat kid disobeys their parent—just for the sake of doing it. This post will not get positive feedback. Sadly, what is true and good is a pain-inducing barrier for some (liberals) to overcome."

Anonymous liberal 1: "Jeremy, do you own a slave? Why not? At one time (in nearly every society) it was perfectly acceptable". 

 My response to Anonymous liberal: "Which had nothing to do with liberals (emancipation of the slaves). Anyone that takes a strict reading of the constitution would realize the issue regarding the rights of blacks. It had nothing to do with the moral degeneration that is occurring today. Apples and oranges (in case you haven't noticed, homosexual marriage is not slavery). If a gay person wants to get married, they should find an opposite sex partner or settle with a civil union. Here's a scenerio that will put my argument into context...
Imagine that the vast majority of society enjoys using Mayo on their sandwiches. However, about 3% of the population likes to use peanut butter. Those that love peanut butter create a bunch of activist groups to fight for the right to call peanut butter "Mayo". The peanut butter activists are successful and now peanut butter is referred to as "Mayo". The issue now is that Mayo refers to ANY sandwich spread and thus the word has lost its original meaning. Simple, right?"

Anonymous liberal 2: "No the conservatives strategy is obviously to deny they are gay until they get caught... happens all the time. True conservatives should applaud gay marriage as a conservative belief... "

My response: "Your warped brain needs to believe that. Reality: There is nothing conservative about gay marriage."

Anonymous liberal 1: "Again, your world view is incredibly limited. You're hard to speak with because I am an educated elitist. 
Everything you said is simple, but that doesn't make it right. You can't put your POV into any sort of context besides ignorance and intolerance." 

My response to Anonymous liberal 1: "Educated elitist? You seem more like a pseudo-intellectual, ego-maniac to me. You don't know my educational background. I know liberals let their imaginations get a hold of them. Sure, it probably feels good to daydream about how "elite" and "open-minded" you are; I'm sure you dream about your liberal superpowers regularly. Now, getting back to reality; while I'm not going to brag about the degrees I have, I will let you know that I have a decent background in Sociology and Psychology (one more-so than the other...I'll let you guess which). So when it comes to this subject matter (social issues and human psychology), it's very unlikely that you are significantly more knowledgeable than me. 

As for you: Be aware of the "perceptions" that you take for granted that are mere products of the imagination (liberals tend to be delusional). Realize that you are not a mind-reader, you'll be happier (and less deluded) in life. Did I forget to mention that your delusions of grandeur can get better if you step back down to earth? :) Yep, I believe so...

By the way, tolerance is not acceptance. I don't need to accept your worldview, but I admit that I am forced to tolerate the fact that people like you (liberals) roam the surface of this planet."

Anonymous liberal 3: "Jesus was a Liberal."

My response to Anonymous liberal 3: That's nonsense. Jesus didn't talk favorably about tax collectors, was against premarital sex (and even lusting "in the heart"), divorce, murder (he would not have supported abortion), supported the Old Testament (which had very strict laws), and warned of hell for sinners. If Jesus could come to earth today, I'm sure he would see liberal behavior as an abomination. 

I'll update if people leave comments about my comment. I'm fishing for a debate, let's hope I get some bites :)  Feel free to debate and/or just plain discuss the liberal vs. conservative cultural conflict in the comment section here.

*Update* Caught me some good, dopey liberals. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. 

Liberals are Bad People (rant)

I don't like liberals. Liberals--aside from being incredibly obnoxious--are destructive to society. When I was younger, I had a few liberal beliefs. Also, I wouldn't consider myself to be a Republican: I don't support outsourcing for example. I suppose what I am referring to are the social liberals (me being a social conservative). To be honest, I'm a cultural Christian. What I mean by this is that I believe in much of the moral teachings of Jesus and enjoy the holidays. Anyways, getting back on topic, liberals fight against the nuclear family, traditional culture (which is very important for social cohesion), and having a strong work-ethic (certain beliefs and social policies discourage work-ethic). Liberals are like a chain smoker getting cancer and patting themselves on the back when the start drinking green tea. Liberalism has caused damage to american society for sure. Liberals are like a brat child that do the opposite of what an authority figure (such as the father) wants them to do.

I strongly dislike liberals and the direction they want this country to go in. Previously this blog went after religious stupidity (I've lightened up on religion, and think it can be a good thing for society), now I'm looking to focus on liberal stupidity (which I believe causes societal chaos).

Cognition Filters and why Liberals lack them.

There is an importance to creating filters in the mind so that we prevent unwanted and/or painful thoughts to enter into conscious awareness so that they don't become bothersome. In the society we live in today, we are perhaps too open about certain topics, and have become brainwashed into believing we should over-think things that cause emotional pain to "get it out" (which doesn't actually work, but instead makes the problem even worse). Suppression is a good thing, if done right. The brain is designed to handle emotionally-disturbing thoughts by the use of unconsciously filtering them out. There are many topics that people run away from (like the thought of their grandparents having sex, or death), and this is a good thing. The "liberal" mind is wired to over-think everything to the point that they feel they understand everything. I've noticed that liberals tend to not respect the boundaries of others and they tend to psychologically damaged by their "thinking outside the box". "Thinking outside the box" is not a good thing because it removes important context anchors that ground people to reality. A "context anchor" is something that gives people a steady context so that they have a clear view of reality, which can only be perceived through the senses. Liberals lose touch with reality because they lose the awareness that their worldview is imaginary (everyone's is, we don't have telepathy). Essentially the problem is the disconnection from reality caused by certain types of thinking. I believe the cause of the liberal-progressivism that we see today is the television, internet, and music (to name a few). In order to watch TV (and understand it), we must remove the self from the equation; essentially TV forces the mind to ignore the body as a context anchor.

I plan to write more on this problem. Psychological problems are so pervasive in this society, and as a society our perceptions of reality have become so distorted that we have lost touch with reality.