It's funny seeing those two bitches on their periods (redundant, I know) fake being offended. Bill O'Reilly is right, we were attacked by Muslims on 9/11 (sky is blue). Those "women" are PC zombies that do mental gymnastics to avoid offending a group of people—satisfying a faith that all people are the same and should be treated as such, regardless of their actions.
The fact is, we were attacked by Muslims—Muslims who based their courage and hatred on their religious convictions. If we were to ask a 'fanatic' of the Islamic faith how they would describe themselves—they would not use the word 'fanatic'— instead, terms like 'true-Muslim' or 'devout-Muslim' would be used.
Whoopi Goldberg and that other bitch had that all-so-common "I'm holding back an erection" look in their eyes (I mean that metaphorically, I think). They both were certainty holding back smiles (look closely at the video if you didn't notice it). They assume that their position is the open-minded one—patting each other on the back during their whole act—anyone that didn't notice how fake the anger was is blind.
There very well may be Muslims that use the Islamic religion for peaceful purposes. But we also must accept that some Muslims use the religion for destructive purposes. Those that use it for destructive purposes are not twisting the religion anymore than the 'moderates'. In other words, the way in which Islam is interpreted is all based on the disposition of individual.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people, and people killed people on 9/11. People that follow the Christian religion can find many reasons in the Bible to justify violence (they do and have). But, at the same time to deny that it was Muslims that attacked us on 9/11 is absurd. Why don't we show the same unjustified respect towards Nazis? If being a Nazi was a religious thing (instead of social/political) the way which they are talked about would be much different—why is that?
