Belgian Police Raid Catholic Church HQ in Sex Abuse Probe

Top Catholic Priest Accused of Sexually Abusing His Own Sons

Why are so many Catholic priests pedophiles?


Why does the Catholic Church protect pedophiles?


With all these incidences of pedophilia that have brought to the media's attention over the last few years, I cannot understand why any sane human would continue to belong to this cult of child rapists (maybe they don't watch the news or don't care). The Vatican should have action taken against it for crimes against humanity—being that it is actively engaged in protecting pedophiles, this makes them accessories after-the-fact (maybe 'before' in some cases).

There is an obvious trend here with the Catholic Church and pedophilia. Should the Catholic Church be considered a safe-haven for pedophiles? Absolutely, at least until the organization becomes aware of their moral-hypocrisy. They see condoms being used to prevent aids as being worse than the virus itself on one hand, and priests doing sexual things with young boys as being acceptable on the other—what a strange moral philosophy.

While it wouldn't completely eliminate all of it, allowing priests to marry would be a big step. In my opinion, any man that decides to live his entire life in celibacy isn't playing with a full deck of cards, this is probably the main reason why the priesthood attracts such people. Now, I'm not claiming all Catholic priests are pedophiles (impossible to know). Perhaps there are some genuine men which love God more than having sex and raising a family. I obviously am unable to understand it, just like I am unable to understand why a person would do that to a child.

Oil Spill a False Flag?

I came across these videos the other day. With the lack of information I can't really form an opinion on them—but a good conspiracy theory is always entertaining. It seems as if something so immense as this natural disaster would be impossible to fake. I suppose there is a decently sized void of information that must be overcome. It's rather oil or it isn't; if I was a betting man, I would put my money on oil.





Either way, the following questions must be answered:

Why are the people involved caught up in so much easily avoidable drama?
Why can't a pipe be plugged up in a period of two months?
Is the air space and beaches really inaccessible?


I have my doubts as to whether this is a false flag, but who knows, crazier things have happened.

Is it better to be a "paranoid conspiracy freak" than "a sheep being led into a meat grinder"?

You decide...

God: an asshole father?

The message on this church sign says more than what was probably intended. This message was up during fathers day which is hilarious.

What will happen to 'The Man with a 30 Second Memory'?

Check out this video; obviously such a guy could never believe in a god, and should be going to hell. Otherwise all "good-atheists" would have to be let in as well. Why is this? well, both are unable to believe in a religion because their brains get in the way.



Hypothetically, if this all-powerful creator wanted atheists to believe in nonsense like magic and unicorns (it's in the bible) he would have given them a brain similar to what this person is using...

Why was Sarah Palin fortunate enough to be born with a brain so incapable of intelligence? It is because of her incapable brain that she is unable to grasp concepts like evolution. People like Sarah Palin would (and do) have a much easier time believing in talking snakes and demons than a person of intelligence.

For example, a person that thought Africa was a country....



Would have a much easier time believing in things like witchcraft...






The problem many atheists have (non-herd atheists) is that, contrary to what believers think, we ARE able to wrap our heads around what religious belief is, and it is because of this that we are unable to engage in it. We understand the insanity behind those who speak in tongues, and even why such people would truly believe in the validity of such actions. 



I don't think many believers in a hell (Christians, Muslims, etc.) view this website, but if any manage to find their way here, answer the following questions.

Will the guy with a 30 Second Memory go to hell?

Why?

I'm probably the only one who finds this funny....

Vegetarians: whiniest people on earth?

Vegetarians fall into the same category for me that Christians, Muslims etc. are found in. However, they seem much more afraid of the truth behind the deliciousness of meat than believers are of their "lowly" origins. The problem with vegetarians is that they over-think the consumption of meat so much that they warp the reality of the source of the meat itself. Vegetarians look at an animal and project their large human mind into the head of let's say a chicken (a brain slightly bigger than a pea). A chicken does not experience life like a human does. Chickens do not have the complexity of thoughts that we do, yet vegetarians appear to believe that they do, or perhaps it is subconscious. I would be willing to bet that chickens do not even understand what death is (or any of our prey-species). Sure, they experience some pain a few moments before death, but once it is over, so is the pain. Way over 99% of the chicken's life was a well fed, protected existence—definitely preferable to what a chicken's existence would be in the wild (I'll get into that more later on).

Regardless, vegetarians are experiencing a misfiring of their evolutionary hard-wiring against cannibalism. This I believe is the explanation for the nausea that a vegetarian experiences when the thought of eating meat comes into their minds. This nausea is the same as the feeling of nausea caused by the thought of cannibalism, which exists in most humans. Obviously, being the species that we are, it is beneficial for us not to eat one another. Across virtually all cultures, cannibalism is viewed with the strongest possible disgust—in fact the few that engaged in the practice were made infamous for it. No one needed to let you know that cannibalism is gross, you automatically perceive it as such—this shows how being anti-cannibalism is hardwired into our brains.



All people innately enjoy the taste of meat (why vegetarians often enjoy eating imitation meat). It is the reality-warping thought patterns that delude the thinking of a vegetarian, and this is why I lump vegetarians and religious believers into the same group. It should be obvious as to what I am referring to when I say "delude". Vegetarians perceive all other animals as being human, which is why they find it disgusting to eat them. It is a similar delusion which makes certain people go ape-shit when they see animals getting "abused" and perceiving it like those animals are human, and should be treated as such (should we lock up all praymantis females after they murder and cannibalize their husbands?). While I do not think any animal should have to experience senseless pain, we all have to experience some pain to earn our keep; animals are not superior to humans, and the animals intended for human consumption are here to serve that role. Do not confuse what I am saying with people that beat dogs or whatever, I obviously am against that because that pain is senseless and destructive towards the purpose of companionship that a pet is for.

Animals such as cows and chickens are the prey of humans, it is as simple as that. Vegetarians/animal rights people as a whole seem to think that the wild is some sacred place that apparently all animals "belong". Well, here is the lovely wild. I would much rather be killed in a slaughter house than to be killed in this way, but maybe it's just me...




The life of an animal in the wild is not all that pleasant, they are pushed to the limit, and when they get old or sick they often get mauled to death by a predator (if not before). Is a fate such as that really that much better than living on a farm? Prey species need their predators just as much as their predators need them—it is a mutual relationship. If there were no predators for a prey-species, then they would find themselves overpopulating and constantly avoiding starvation. Is it better that an animal is near starving its whole life than to be killed at the end of it by some predator? Predators try to ensure their prey is well fed (some directly, some indirectly)—it is the way of nature, and humans are a part of nature.

This is why I think that vegetarians/animal rights people are the whiniest pussies on earth, they think all animals should behave like the Brady Bunch (we are animals, sorry), and to make it worse, they are so damn vocal about it. I believe that all such people should go into Africa and try to convince lions to go vegan, just to see how the ultimate disagreers in their diet-philosophy react to their presence.

An animal that is well fed during its life and is killed at the end to serve some purpose has had a more meaningful and enjoyable life than one that spends it close to starvation, and ultimately becomes worm-food (an all but meaningless purpose). In death all animals (us included) will be consumed in some way. While a slaughter house is not all too pleasant, it is certainly a lesser evil for those animals than to have never been born or to suffer in the wild. Now some people may think that those animals lives would be better to have not existed at all—well, I guess that would be a disagreement. However, to say that animals would be better off not existing at all would be considered racist if that same logic was applied to the suffering Ethiopians. If you are a person that personifies animals in order to get that fear of cannibalism, then you can't have your cake and eat it to. Just because an animal experiences pain during its life does not give you the right (in my opinion) to wish that animal was never born at all. The same goes for a person that claims that the mentally handicapped should all be aborted, being that it would be the "humane thing to do".

--------

I have made a blog-site specifically for arguing against PETA, click here to take you to it. :)