What a tool.
Christianity is making the claim, it is up to them to prove it. Atheists are denying the claim, and Christians have provided no evidence. Why would it be up to the atheists to prove their position? The atheist position is true thus far because Christians (or believers in other deities) have failed to prove their position (atheists obviously being deniers of God). Many of the bible's claims have been scientifically/historically disproven, and the bible is the source of the Christian god (this shows that the writers were full of it). Atheism can only be disproven if God (or any god) is proven to exist (hasn't happened yet). The atheist stance is only that there are no deity/s, the burden of proof does not rest on them because they are not making a claim (atheists are denying the claim of god/s existing).
Shouldn't all of this be obvious? If you read this Shockofgod, think long and hard about the below example, and how it is applicable to you.
Me: "There is an invisible unicorn in my room that can freely move through any object."
Unicorn Skeptic: "Okay, prove it!"
Me: "Well, you can't prove that it isn't real.."
Unicorn Skeptic: "You're the one making the claim, you're the one with the burden of proof.."
Me: "So you're saying that you cannot prove that my unicorn doesn't exist?"
Unicorn Skeptic: "You're such a f@cking moron.."
Me: "See, you can't prove that they aren't real. This means I must be right!...
No comments:
Post a Comment